LectureNotes 4-9-18
LectureNotes 4-11-18
LectureNotes 4-13-18
Monday, April 16, 2018
Friday, April 13, 2018
13.4#4
I got the integral dx (x^2) + (8x) dy= 2x + 0
(7,0) (7+y,y) 2x +0
But it doesn't seem to work
*******************
OK, to use Green's theorem you need the formula ∬ ∂F_2/∂x - ∂F_1/∂y dA = ∫_C F_1dx + F_2dy, where the line integral is counter clockwise, while you seem to have computed ∂F_1/∂x + ∂F_2/∂y. Also, note that the line integral in question is computed clockwise, which will change the sign of the left side the above equation.
(7,0) (7+y,y) 2x +0
But it doesn't seem to work
*******************
OK, to use Green's theorem you need the formula ∬ ∂F_2/∂x - ∂F_1/∂y dA = ∫_C F_1dx + F_2dy, where the line integral is counter clockwise, while you seem to have computed ∂F_1/∂x + ∂F_2/∂y. Also, note that the line integral in question is computed clockwise, which will change the sign of the left side the above equation.
13.4#3
I'm not sure what I got wrong. I came out with the integral
(3sqrt(2)/2),(0) (sqrt(9-y^2)^2), (y) 4-2 dy dx
********************************
Well it looks like you did two things wrong. The first and most important is that ∂F_1/∂y = -2, so you should have had 4-(-2) =6, not 4-2=2. The second might be that your integral should have been dxdy not dydx. Also, a) the integrand is a constant and so polar integration might be easier, and b) the area of a pie wedge is (1/2)(Δθ)r^2, which is to say (9π/8) you could use that instead of doing an integral
Sunday, April 8, 2018
Sunday, April 1, 2018
make $40
Hi All, this is from some of my colleagues in the School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences:
************
We are writing on behalf of our NSF-funded project, DIRACC: Designing and Assessing a Rigorous Approach to Conceptual Calculus. One task in this project was to design a Calculus 2 concept inventory (C2CI). We have done this, and we are at the stage of trying it out with calculus students.
We are seeking volunteers from Calculus 2 and Calculus 3 students at ASU to help us validate the C2CI. We will make a cash payment of $40 to each student taking it. Students scoring in the top 50% will receive a bonus of $20.
Test dates are April 16 and 17, with arrival times staggered at 4:30, 5:30, 6:30.
Go to http://bit.ly/RecruitC2CI to register. You will pick a date and time when registering.
Thank you in advance,
Pat Thompson, PI
Fabio Milner, co-PI
Mark Ashbrook, co-PI
************
We are writing on behalf of our NSF-funded project, DIRACC: Designing and Assessing a Rigorous Approach to Conceptual Calculus. One task in this project was to design a Calculus 2 concept inventory (C2CI). We have done this, and we are at the stage of trying it out with calculus students.
We are seeking volunteers from Calculus 2 and Calculus 3 students at ASU to help us validate the C2CI. We will make a cash payment of $40 to each student taking it. Students scoring in the top 50% will receive a bonus of $20.
Test dates are April 16 and 17, with arrival times staggered at 4:30, 5:30, 6:30.
Go to http://bit.ly/RecruitC2CI to register. You will pick a date and time when registering.
Thank you in advance,
Pat Thompson, PI
Fabio Milner, co-PI
Mark Ashbrook, co-PI
Thursday, March 29, 2018
Friday, March 23, 2018
12.3#15
I don't understand this problem. I've tried multiplying the base and hieght and tried to do this:
I (pi 0) I (8 0 )(x=rcosA - r^2)r dr dz dA
I (pi 0) I (8 0 )(x=rcosA - r^2)r dr dz dA
*******************
well, its hard to figure out what you mean but I guess maybe you mean A=θ, and I guess you're doing a triple integral, which could work but is excessive for a homework problem dealing with polar integrals (and wrong as you've implemented here).
From the way the plane z=x cuts the xy-plane at the y-axis, and from the fact that the region is above the xy-plane, you have a base that's a semidisk in the x≥0 part of the xy-plane and a height (z) that's equal to x above that, which gives the integrals
∫_{-π/2}^{π/2} ∫_0^8 r cos(θ) r dr dθ,
∫_{-π/2}^{π/2} ∫_0^8 r cos(θ) r dr dθ,
so you kind of have the integrand except for that -r^2) part. The limits of integration in r are fine, but the limits of integration in θ would be for the plane z=y instead of z=x.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



